Geography education has long been dominated by visual instruction, relying on maps, globes, and spatial diagrams to convey complex geographic relationships. This visual bias inherently excludes blind and visually impaired (BVI) students, whose access to the geographic curriculum has traditionally been limited. As a result, BVI learners have often been marginalized in social studies and STEM classrooms, denied the opportunity to develop foundational spatial reasoning skills critical to academic success and independent navigation (Kumar et al., 2018).
However, a shift is underway. Advances in tactile and multi-sensory cartographic tools are reshaping geography education by offering accessible and inclusive alternatives for BVI students. These tools include raised-line maps, three-dimensional models, audio-tactile interfaces, haptic feedback devices, and even multisensory systems that incorporate sound, texture, and smell. When incorporated into instruction, they allow BVI learners to build spatial understanding, participate in geography curricula, and engage in map-based problem-solving activities that were previously inaccessible (Brulé et al., 2018).
This paper explores the impact of multi-sensory cartographic tools on the geographical literacy of BVI students across the K–12 spectrum in the United States. It reviews the cognitive and educational benefits of these tools, examines pedagogical frameworks supporting their integration, and presents implementation case studies. The paper also outlines accessibility standards and innovations addressing persistent challenges. Ultimately, it argues that tactile and multi-sensory cartography provides a gateway to educational equity and empowers BVI students to engage fully in geographic learning.
The most immediate benefit of multi-sensory cartographic tools is their ability to support the development of spatial cognition in BVI learners. Spatial cognition—the mental representation of location, distance, and direction—is foundational for geographical reasoning. Tactile maps, raised-relief models, and audio-labeled tools enable students to explore spatial relationships through touch and sound, forming accurate cognitive maps of spaces they cannot see (Espinosa & Ochaita, 1998). In a seminal study, Espinosa and Ochaita (1998) demonstrated that BVI adults trained with tactile maps performed better on orientation and route-planning tasks than those who only received verbal directions. Similarly, research by Ungar et al. (1999) with BVI children found that participants using raised-line maps exhibited better layout recall and directional understanding than those relying on auditory cues alone. These findings confirm that tactile and audio inputs together enhance spatial memory and comprehension.
Beyond cognitive gains, multi-sensory tools improve content acquisition in subjects like history, environmental science, and civics. Audio-tactile maps, in which students touch different locations to trigger recorded descriptions, support dual coding—the processing of verbal and nonverbal information simultaneously (Paivio, 1986). This leads to deeper conceptual learning. In classrooms, students using such tools not only master place names and physical features but also retain complex data about regions, such as population density or climate patterns (Giraud et al., 2017).
Moreover, multi-sensory maps boost engagement. Blind students often report greater enjoyment and confidence when using tactile globes, interactive talking maps, or textured atlases. Positive affect is crucial for maintaining motivation, especially in subjects that might otherwise be perceived as abstract or exclusionary (Brulé et al., 2018). Students who feel included are more likely to take ownership of their learning, participate in classroom discussions, and pursue advanced geography courses.
Perhaps most importantly, these tools foster independence. In a global survey, Bleau et al. (2025) found that early exposure to tactile maps was correlated with improved independent navigation and higher life satisfaction in adults with visual impairments. BVI students who learn to read maps become more confident travelers, more active in community life, and more likely to pursue higher education. In this way, the benefits of tactile geography tools extend far beyond the classroom.
Implementing tactile and multi-sensory cartographic tools requires a shift in pedagogical practice. Effective geography instruction for BVI students must be grounded in principles of inclusive education, particularly Universal Design for Learning (UDL). UDL encourages educators to present content in multiple formats, removing barriers to access and engagement (Meyer et al., 2014). In a UDL-aligned classroom, tactile maps are not supplemental but integral. While sighted students may view printed maps, BVI students explore tactile versions with braille or audio labels. The information presented is equivalent, not diminished. In this context, inclusive instruction promotes equity without segregation. Peetz (2023) emphasized that inclusive classrooms benefit all students, with multi-sensory tools supporting diverse learning styles beyond those with disabilities.
Instructional sequencing is another essential consideration. Teachers of the Visually Impaired (TVIs) often introduce geographic concepts through real objects and 3D models before progressing to symbolic tactile graphics. This scaffolding helps students understand scale, directional relationships, and symbolic representation (Perkins School for the Blind, n.d.). For example, a student might first explore a 3D clay model of a mountain before transitioning to a raised-relief map showing elevation contours.
Collaboration between general education teachers, TVIs, and Orientation & Mobility (O&M) specialists is also critical. O&M instructors frequently use tactile maps to teach real-world navigation skills. When paired with classroom instruction, these lessons reinforce both academic and life skills. A student learning about urban geography might use a tactile map of the local transit system to plan and execute a route to school, combining content learning with independence training.
Project-based learning provides another effective instructional method. Students can construct tactile maps using foam, fabric, string, and braille labels to depict towns, landmarks, or continents. These projects foster deeper understanding, creativity, and ownership of learning. They also provide opportunities for collaboration with sighted peers, promoting social inclusion and shared learning experiences.
Real-world applications of multi-sensory cartographic tools demonstrate their impact. One notable study by Giraud et al. (2017) involved French middle school students using a 3D-printed interactive map representing a historical kingdom. The model included tactile features and voice output. Students using this tool recalled more information about geography and historical events than those who used traditional tactile maps with braille labels. In the United States, Kapperman and Maloney (2021) described how they modified a commercial talking globe and puzzle map for a blind fifth-grade student. By adding tactile markers and braille labels, they enabled the student to independently learn U.S. geography.
Brulé et al. (2018) conducted an exploratory study using multisensory maps with sound, texture, and scent to teach land use and urban-rural distinctions. Children engaged with tactile representations of different zones while experiencing associated sounds (e.g., traffic for urban areas) and smells (e.g., grass or coffee). Another example is the Tactile Map Automated Production (TMAP) project by Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute. TMAP allows educators to generate custom tactile street maps of any U.S. location. These maps are used in both orientation and academic contexts, giving students localized and personalized geographic tools (Subryan, 2019).
The American Printing House for the Blind (APH) has also expanded access to tactile atlases, maps, and interactive learning systems, ensuring usability in classroom settings. The production and use of tactile cartographic tools must align with formal accessibility guidelines. In the U.S., the Braille Authority of North America (BANA) sets standards for tactile graphics, including map symbols, spacing, labeling, and texture usage (BANA, 2010). Legal mandates such as IDEA and ADA require that students with print disabilities receive materials in accessible formats (Smith & Anderson, 2020). Digital accessibility is governed by the WCAG, and emerging tools are beginning to support screen reader compatibility. NIMAC helps schools source accessible textbooks and diagrams, including geographic materials. Standardized assessments provide tactile graphics developed under BANA guidelines.
Despite these advances, barriers remain. The most pressing are cost and limited availability of tactile materials. Traditional raised-line maps and embossers are expensive. Few general education teachers have training in tactile instruction. Students may struggle with tactile map reading if not introduced early and systematically (Bleau et al., 2025). Emerging technologies such as 3D printing, refreshable tactile displays like the APH Monarch (APH, 2024), and haptic systems are addressing these barriers. Multisensory learning kits using sound, smell, and texture align with theories that multisensory input improves retention (Shams & Seitz, 2008).
Multi-sensory cartographic tools are transforming the way geography is taught and learned by blind and visually impaired K–12 students. Through tactile, auditory, and even olfactory channels, these tools make spatial knowledge accessible, meaningful, and engaging. The evidence is clear: BVI students who use tactile maps and related tools develop stronger spatial cognition, perform better in geography assessments, and gain critical independence skills (Bleau et al., 2025; Espinosa & Ochaita, 1998). When geography instruction reflects Universal Design for Learning and incorporates tactile supports, BVI students become active explorers of the world.
References
American Printing House for the Blind. (2024). Meet Monarch. https://www.aph.org/product/monarch/
Bleau, M., Kafle, K., Wang, M., Kabore, S. S., Cueva-Vargas, J. L., & Nemargut, J. P. (2025). International prevalence of tactile map usage and its impact on navigational independence and well-being of people with visual impairments. Scientific Reports, 15(1), Article 27245. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-08117-9
Braille Authority of North America. (2010). Guidelines and standards for tactile graphics. https://www.brailleauthority.org/tg/
Brulé, E., Bailly, G., Brock, A., Gentès, A., & Jouffrais, C. (2018). An exploratory study of the uses of a multisensory map with visually impaired children. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 2(3), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti2030036
Espinosa, M. A., & Ochaita, E. (1998). Using tactile maps to improve the practical spatial knowledge of adults who are blind. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 92(5), 338–345.
Giraud, S., Brock, A., Macé, M. J. M., & Jouffrais, C. (2017). Map learning with a 3D printed interactive small-scale model: Improvement of space and text memorization in visually impaired students. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 930. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00930
Johnson, K., & Higgins, A. (2019). Embodied geography: Using wearable haptics for non-visual spatial learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3221–3233.
Kapperman, G., & Maloney, S. (2021). Innovative and affordable options for adapting geographic materials for students with blindness. Journal of Blindness Innovation and Research, 11(2). https://nfb.org/jbir
Kumar, D., Ryles, R., & Kampe, J. (2018). Social studies and students with visual impairments: Challenges and interventions. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 112(5), 497–502.
Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal Design for Learning: Theory and practice. CAST Professional Publishing.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press.
Peetz, C. (2023, August 10). Creating inclusive classrooms for blind students can benefit everyone. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org
Perkins School for the Blind. (n.d.). Teaching tactile literacy through maps. https://www.perkins.org
Shams, L., & Seitz, A. R. (2008). Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.006
Smith, M., & Anderson, L. (2020). The preparedness of teachers to deliver tactile graphics content. Teaching Exceptional Children, 52(6), 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059919858146
Subryan, H. (2019). Tactile maps as navigational aids. IDeA Center, University at Buffalo. http://idea.ap.buffalo.edu
Taylor, J., Jaeger, P., & McKenzie, R. (2016). Open source tactile map design tools for education. Library Technology Reports, 52(5), 34–39.
Ungar, S., Blades, M., & Spencer, C. (1999). The construction of cognitive maps by children with visual impairments. In J. Golledge (Ed.), Wayfinding behavior: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes (pp. 247–273). Johns Hopkins University Press.